From ba8cb8ff76e8059528c4a9e81cb545733fc08f3a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pagwin Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 22:24:50 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] mild word change to refer to margin of error as 0 rather than infinitely doing something --- content/blog/finite_KCMP_nums.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/content/blog/finite_KCMP_nums.md b/content/blog/finite_KCMP_nums.md index 535688f..e75a3b0 100644 --- a/content/blog/finite_KCMP_nums.md +++ b/content/blog/finite_KCMP_nums.md @@ -120,7 +120,7 @@ I hypothesize that all of the universal constants have infinite KCMP due to the The reason the probability is practically 100% is because the size of finite KCMP numbers is countably infinite and because the size of the real numbers is bigger that means that the set of numbers with infinite KCMP is the size of the real numbers thereby being infinitely bigger making the ratio comparable to 1:∞ meaning the probability of any universal constant having finite KCMP(assuming all are chosen fully randomly over a continuum) is 0(technically not impossible for math reasons but practically impossible). -As for the question of unfalsifiability we'd need to be able to make infinitely precise measurements to confirm it one way or the other and things like plank's constant conspire to prevent this in addition to us doing anything infinitely is pretty difficult if it's possible at all. +As for the question of unfalsifiability we'd need to be able to make infinitely precise measurements to confirm it one way or the other and things like plank's constant conspire to prevent this in addition to us measuring with an error margin of 0 is pretty difficult if it's possible at all. ## Conclusion