Compare commits

..

No commits in common. "48f10951b5175271232d32c4874cc2c9e2bfe2db" and "c54f0d7c35f8a52d913a5430baab08b3a66eb81d" have entirely different histories.

3 changed files with 0 additions and 25 deletions

View file

@ -1,4 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Article Purgatory"
description: If you find this page somehow then just so you know this page exists because I made a folder for articles I haven't and probably will never release so you can just forget about it and miss nothing.
---

View file

@ -1,21 +0,0 @@
---
title: "Comparing Rust and C++"
description: "A post on how I view rust and C++ in relation to each other and my thoughts on them"
date: "2024-04-11"
draft: true
---
# What this is not
This is not me dunking in C++ because of memory safety (mostly). It also isn't unbiased I like Rust more than C++ for a couple of reasons.
# C++ is acceptable in some places
It has references and it has a way of distinguishing between references which can change stuff and references that can't. It has smart pointers `std::unique_ptr` and `std::shared_ptr` (we'll come back to this) alongside RAII via destructors `~class_name`. It has declarative/functional ways of working with iterators via stuff in the algorithm header in particular `std::transform`, `std::copy_if` and `std::find`. This is all nice and if C++ didn't have it I would complain about it. Anyways onto complaining about C++ due to being spoiled by Rust.
# Complaints